About Seungwoo Lee
He is a Senior Supervising Engineer with a high level of expertise in the design and analysis of suspension bridges. He has a solid fundamental understanding of structures and can apply his knowledge exceptionally well to the design and analysis of highly complex structures. He is also a strong communicator, able to identify and distill the key information that is relevant to the task at hand and present it in a clear and quickly understandable manner.
Achievements











Professional Projects
Expert Tip: Suspension Bridge Analysis Using Trigonometric Methods
Expert Tips : How to Perform Time-Dependent Analysis
How to Perform Time-dependent Analysis?
Mainly there are two ways to perform the time-dependent analysis. One is the time-step analysis and the other is the age-adjusted method. The age-adjusted method is a simplified one and can consider the long-term effects with only a one-step analysis. Of course, this is an approximate way to consider..
Expert Tips : Material Properties' Time Functions
Expert Tips : Convergence Study in Curved Girder Analysis
It is easy to obtain the result from bridge finite element analysis, but to get more accurate results requires extra efforts. Even the most robust finite element analysis solvers adopts the method that approximates the structural behavior, by minimizing the associated error function compared with the complex function that represents the realistic structural behavior.
Expert Tips : Nonlinearities in Cable-Stayed Bridge Analysis
Why is cable-stayed bridge difficult to analyze?
Cable-stayed bridges, including so-called Extradosed bridges, do not have any classical solutions. Computer based displacement method is the only way to analyze cable-stayed bridges and it is hard to check the output. Also, in the cable-stayed bridge analysis, the following three nonlinearities should be considered.
Expert Tips : Geometric Nonlinearity Explained
Expert Tips : Can We Perform Shear Design With A Single Input?
Expert Tip: Pile Cap Design Using Iteration and Optimization
Expert Tip: Influence Line Theory for Curved Girders
Expert Tips: Iteration and Optimization 1
Expert Tips: Iteration and Optimization 2
Expert Tips: Creep Analysis 1
Expert Tips: Creep Analysis 2
Expert Tips: Creep Analysis 3
Expert Tips: Creep Analysis 4
To better understand the creep behavior, solve the previous example in a less efficient way. Here, different sign conventions will be applied.
At time t0, the immediate displacements/rotations for member 1 due to uniform loads are
Expert Tips: Creep Analysis 5
Expert Tips: Creep Analysis 6
Expert Tips: Creep Analysis 7
Expert Tips: Influence Line Analysis for Continuous Girders
Expert Tip: Curvature Effects on A Medium-Span Curved Bridge
Expert Tips: Unsymmetric Section Analysis
Expert Tip: Suspension Bridges 1
Expert Tip: Suspension Bridges 2
Expert Tip: Analysis of Suspension Bridges 3
Although the main span of 1480 ft may not be impressive, the Manhattan Bridge is the first bridge designed by a non-linear theory and called the first modern suspension bridge.
With the success of the Manhattan Bridge, Moisseiff became confident with his solution and designed the George Washington Bridge, a main span of 3500 ft, which is more than twice the Manhattan bridge. The George Washington Bridge was opened in 1931 and is the first bridge with a main span of more than 1 km (3000 ft).
Expert Tip: Analysis of Suspension Bridges 5
Expert Tips: PM Interaction Diagram Part 1
Expert Tip: Curved Girder Analysis Part 2
The previous article (Curvature effects on a medium-span curved bridge) showed that we should be cautious to get reasonable torsional moments through simple beam analysis. One of the easiest ways to refine the results is to add more nodes at the inner support locations, however, we still have a question about “how many?”. Now we are reviewing the effect of curvature for bending moments.
We are trying to find bending moments for three spans continuous curved girder, 150
ft + 223 ft + 150 ft = 523 ft, the radius is 1182’-6” as shown.
Expert Tip: Creep Analysis - Next Steps
Expert Tip: Concrete shear design based on AASHTO LRFD 1
Traditionally AASHTO and ACI gave us β=2 and θ=45° and these values are also allowed at the current AASHTO LRFD for some limited cases as defined in 5.7.3.4.1.
Expert Tip: Concrete shear design based on AASHTO LRFD 2
Believe it or not, longitudinal forces are caused by shear, and we do need to design/check for these longitudinal forces even under the pure shear condition. “Unfortunately, this concept was not included when the shear design procedures were originally developed. This omission can be a serious shortcoming”. (Design of highway bridges, An LRFD approach, 3rd ed. by Baker and Puckett, 2013)
Expert Tip: Concrete shear design based on AASHTO LRFD 3
Expert Tip: Concrete shear design based on AASHTO LRFD 4
Expert Tip: Concrete shear design based on AASHTO LRFD 5
Expert Tip: Moment of Inertia for Cracked Circular Concrete Section
Expert Tips: Dynamic Basics Part 2
Expert Tips: Finite Element Method Basic 1
Expert Tips: Finite Element Method Basic 2
Expert Tips: Finite Element Method Basic 3
Expert Tip: Finite Element Method Basics 4
In the FEM, the most critical question is “how many meshes do we need to get the correct (or reasonable) results?”
Most elements within the commercial programs have been tested and verified that they are converged with element number increases. This statement seems to be given, but not true for all elements. Theoretically, we can get the correct results if we have an infinite number of elements, but this is not feasible. So we have to decide the number of elements with the allowable error.